Set it to test your USB3 connected drive and allow it to run to completion. To get a handle on this, I would download the FREE ATTO disk benchmark. many require a previous release to run the faster USB3 speeds. If the mainboard is Intel-based, it will require a separate Intel driver to run those ports properly, and I have found that some Win7 Systems won't even run USB3 properly with the latest release from Intel itself. Win7 has no indigenous USB3 support, it requires outside (3rd party) drivers to support the USB3 speeds. It's important, as that USB3 connection you refer to may only be running at USB2 speeds. We also don't know the architecture (hardware) of that Win7 box.
But it would still be good to determine the underlying issue if there is one.Īrno, 10% of a 1tB drive is a lot of storage. The good news is that subsequent clones will be much faster anyway thanks to Rapid Delta Clone, which means only the changes will be replicated from this point on. It’s not uncommon for imaging/cloning applications to be the first applications to surface this behavior since most people’s everyday usage of their PCs doesn’t have them reading/writing every sector on the disk that contains data, whereas image and clone operations do. If you’re not running third-party anti-virus that’s sometimes known to interfere with Reflect or using something slow like USB 2.0 (where that transfer rate would be just right if you were transferring 1TB of actual data), other possible culprits include a bad cable and an unhealthy source and/or destination disk that’s having to try multiple times to read/write data in certain locations on the disk. What are the source and destination drives (2.5” HDD, 3.5” HDD, SSD?) and how are they connected to the system? How much of that 1TB drive is filled? Any third-party anti-virus running?
0 kommentar(er)
